Securities and Exchange Commission Historical Society

Auditing the Auditors: Creating the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

From the Ground Up: Establishing the PCAOB (Part 3)

Standards

Almost immediately after opening, the PCAOB decided it would hold the standard-setting pen, rather than delegate that responsibility to an outside body, as the Act allowed. “We did not want to risk the perception that we were ceding our authority to the profession that we had been assigned to regulate,” said Dan Goelzer.

The AICPA, however, was not interested in giving up its old standard-setting role. “We felt we owed it to the process and the public interest to make the case that the profession should set standards,” said AICPA President and CEO Barry C. Melancon. On March 18, 2003, before the PCAOB had begun hiring its standards staff, the AICPA’s Auditing Standards Board (ASB) released a draft of an internal control standard, prompting an immediate response from the SEC. In a letter, Acting Chief Accountant Jackson Day made it eminently clear that all standard setting needed to proceed through PCAOB and SEC rulemakings. (1) He suggested that the ASB share the draft with the PCAOB, which they promptly did.

On April 16, 2003, the PCAOB adopted all the AICPA’s Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) through that date as interim standards until the PCAOB could undertake a standard-by-standard review. “These standards are, in a sense, written in disappearing ink,” (2) said Dan Goelzer. The Board planned to make them available on its website. However, the AICPA owns the copyright on all the GAAS standards it has promulgated since the 1940s and sells bound copies of its standards. In demonstrating its willingness to collaborate, the AICPA entered into a contract with the PCAOB allowing the Board to use the GAAS language, as long as the Association’s copyright appears at the bottom of each interim standard until it is amended. The PCAOB continues to make all its standards freely accessible on its website; bound copies are available for purchase through a number of organizations, including the AICPA.

Douglas R. Carmichael sitting at a desk, leaning on his elbow.
Accounting professor and former AICPA standard setter Douglas R. Carmichael became the PCAOB’s first Chief Auditor and Director of Professional Standards.

On April 17, 2003, the PCAOB announced the appointment of Douglas R. Carmichael as Chief Auditor and Director of Professional Standards. Carmichael was a long-time accounting professor at Baruch College and a former Vice President of Standard Setting at the AICPA. As his Deputy, Carmichael selected Thomas Ray, an assurance partner at KPMG who had also served as the AICPA’s Director of Audit and Attest Standards. Their partnership thrived. When Carmichael returned to teaching and his Pennsylvania farm three years later, Ray assumed the Chief Auditor role.

Greg Scates standing in a hall next to a glass wall leading to a meeting room.
Greg Scates, named Deputy Chief Auditor in 2007, spent nearly 16 years at the PCAOB.

Building up their staff was a top priority. Early hires included SEC Enforcement accountant Greg Scates, Ernst & Young audit senior manager Laura J. Phillips, AICPA technical advisor Jennifer Rand, and Keith Wilson, Senior Director of Product Development at a technical publishing house. In 2015, Wilson headed the daunting task of re-codifying more than 1,000 pages of interim and PCAOB-issued standards. Each of these early staffers played a critical role in implementing a standard-setting process and writing the first PCAOB auditing standards. 

According to Carmichael, the Office of Chief Auditor (OCA) wanted its standards to facilitate auditor accountability. Carefully considering the recommendations of the Panel on Audit Effectiveness from August 2000, they sought to write standards with “specific imperatives” rather than establishing “best practices.”  The Board also spent hundreds of hours debating and defining the terms “must,” “should,” and “should consider” for the Rules of the Board. “It was one of the most intellectually valuable and important principles that we were grappling with,” said Board Member Kayla Gillan.

After hiring its core team, OCA began designing its standard-setting process and assigned staff to work on some of the pressing standards required under the Act. However, the adoption of Auditing Standard No. 2, covering the auditor’s responsibilities over public companies’ internal control of financial reporting, proved extremely controversial. Companies complained the audits’ costs outweighed the benefits and that auditors did excessive amounts of work to comply. After only three years, the standard was replaced by a more streamlined version, but the battle turned what had been a favorable political tide away from the PCAOB.

“We had the wind at our back, but then everything changed after the implementation of AS 2,” said Bill Gradison. In the immediate post-Enron environment, there had been wide support to make regulatory changes, but after AS 2, the opposition grew and gave louder voice to those who viewed regulation as burdensome. (For more information, see A Political Hotbed: Crafting the Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Standard)

Standing Advisory Group

Under SOX, the PCAOB was required to appoint an advisory group on standards. The Act did not describe the composition, size or duties of the group, which gave the Board lots of flexibility in forming the Standing Advisory Group (SAG).

From left, Martin F. Baumann (2009-2018), Thomas Ray (2006-2009), Douglas Carmichael (2003-2006)
The PCAOB’s first three chief auditors appeared at the Baruch College Robert Zicklin Center for Corporate Integrity’s 2010 Audit Conference. From left, Martin F. Baumann (2009-2018), Thomas Ray (2006-2009), Douglas Carmichael (2003-2006)

“It included all the constituencies – practicing auditors, investors, preparers, academics and regulators, and they all provided input on what projects we should be working on,” said Douglas Carmichael whom the Board chose to preside over the group. More than 170 people applied for the inaugural SAG panel of 35 individuals, which held its first meeting on June 21, 2004.

“I thought it was very helpful,” said the next Chief Auditor Tom Ray, “It added more transparency to the process and included a lot more people.”

“We wanted all the stakeholders to be together in one body working together and listening to each other,” said Kayla Gillan.

The Board also placed potential critics of the PCAOB onto the SAG “so they could have an open line of communication with the Board,” said Dan Goelzer.

Enforcement

PCAOB Office and Division Directors (2015)
PCAOB Office and Division Directors (2015). Left to Right: S. Bruce Wilson, Director of the Office of International Affairs; Claudius B. Modesti, Director of the Division of Enforcement and Investigations; Helen Munter, Director of the Division of Registration and Inspections; Gregory J. Jonas, Director of the Office of Research and Analysis

The Board’s enforcement arm, charged with investigating and pursuing disciplinary proceedings against audit firms and individual auditors who violated SOX, PCAOB rules or standards, or certain federal securities laws, was the final PCAOB division to be established.

On March 22, 2004, Claudius B. Modesti, an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia who had served in both the Department of Justice’s Criminal Division Fraud Section and SEC Enforcement, was named the first director.

He gathered a core team that included Kyra C. Armstrong, a former Director of the Office of Regulation Policy at the National Association of Securities Dealers and Branch Chief in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement; Ray Hamm, a former Associate Chief Accountant at SEC Enforcement; and Jerry Decker, a Senior Trial Counsel also from SEC Enforcement.

John Abell and Ray Hamm standing in an atrium in front of tall louvred walls.
John Abell (left) was among the first group of inspectors hired in 2003. In 2020, he was named a Deputy Director in the Division of Enforcement and Inspections. Ray Hamm (right) has spent more than 17 years at the Board.

Modesti and his staff began by outlining each element of the enforcement program, from identifying matters to investigate through the litigation, settlement, or closing of cases.

Because the SEC and the PCAOB had overlapping enforcement functions, Modesti spent a lot of time coordinating with SEC Enforcement to ensure his division “was using resources in the most effective way to cover the waterfront of significant auditor misconduct,” he said.

“We were in this very in-between space,” explained Modesti. “We were sort of on the wings of the SEC and under its authority, but at the same time, we were developing this independent responsibility over the accounting profession.”

The first settled disciplinary orders were issued in 2005. The first sanctions in contested disciplinary proceedings were issued in 2009.

In 2007, the Board issued its first settled disciplinary order against a Big Four firm. (3) As part of the settlement, Deloitte & Touche agreed to pay a $1 million fine and implement changes in how it addressed performance issues with audit partners. “We understood from our experiences with the SEC that the PCAOB had the same system of settlement versus litigate and this was a matter we determined to settle; we felt the PCAOB had a lot of leverage on the fine,” said Bob Kueppers, Deloitte’s then Deputy Chief Executive Officer.

Under the Act, the PCAOB monetary penalties collected are to be used to fund scholarships for accounting students. In July 2011, the Board inaugurated its scholarship program, awarding 52-merit based scholarships of $10,000 each. 

As Enforcement matured, the Board’s disciplinary proceedings started to include firms from around the globe. The Board eventually brought disciplinary cases against affiliates of the Big Four in, among other jurisdictions, Mexico, India, Indonesia and Brazil. 

A key provision of SOX that has challenged the Enforcement Division from its inception is the requirement that all disciplinary proceedings must be non-public until there is a final decision imposing a sanction. The rule incentivizes firms to litigate and can allow bad actors to continue to conduct audits and collect fees while they string along their cases. In 2010, the PCAOB began lobbying Congress to change the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to make enforcement proceedings public. The SEC had a similar non-public rule for disciplinary proceedings against accountants and lawyers, which the Commission changed in the late 1980s to provide for public hearings. The SOX non-public provision, inserted by Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), was one of the keys to garnering bipartisan support.

At an Open Meeting on Aug. 5, 2010, Acting Chairman Dan Goelzer directed the staff to develop a proposal to ask Congress to consider amending the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to enable PCAOB’s disciplinary hearings and related proceedings to be made public. Congress did not take any action on what was the Board’s first formal legislative proposal.


Previous Next

Related Museum Resources

Papers

March 18, 2003
image pdf

Photos

June 8, 2004
December 11, 2014
PCAOB Associate Director-Accountant in the Division of Enforcement and Investigations, receiving five-year employee award from Chairman Doty in 2014
(Courtesy of Jonathan Shimmons )
December 16, 2014
Receiving ten-year employee award from PCAOB Chairman Jim Doty in 2014
(Courtesy of Jonathan Shimmons )
December 16, 2014
Deputy Director, PCAOB Division of Enforcment and Investigations (2004-2018), receiving ten-year employee award from Chairman Jim Doty in 2014
(Courtesy of Jonathan Shimmons )
January 1, 2015
PCAOB Ethics Officer and Senior Compliance Counsel (2004-2019)
(Courtesy of Jonathan Shimmons )
January 1, 2015
(Courtesy of Jonathan Shimmons )
December 14, 2015
(Courtesy of Jonathan Shimmons )
December 12, 2016
PCAOB Associate Chief Auditor, Deputy Chief Auditor, then Deputy Division Director (2003-2019)
(Courtesy of Jonathan Shimmons )

Oral Histories

January 30, 2020

Robert J. Kueppers - Founding of the PCAOB

Video: 52:51

Robert J. Kueppers was a partner with Deloitte LLP from 1986 through his retirement in May 2015. Kueppers served Deloitte in a variety of leadership roles, including Deputy CEO, Vice Chairman, Senior Partner of Global Regulatory & Public Policy for the Deloitte US entities, and Managing Partner of the Center for Corporate Governance. Mr. Kueppers was a founding trustee and president of the SEC Historical Society.

October 22, 2019

Claudius B. Modesti

Video: 31:03

Claudius B. Modesti served for 14 years at the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), from 2005 to 2019. He was the PCAOB’s first enforcement director and led the team that built the enforcement group from its inception. He oversaw the development of the PCAOB’s policies and procedures for identifying matters for investigation. His role also included overseeing the Board’s litigation process. In addition, he played a key role in the PCAOB’s collaboration with its foreign regulator counterparts, particularly as it related to international enforcement cooperation.

Made possible through the support of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Permission for Use

The virtual museum and archive is copyrighted by the SEC Historical Society. The Society reserves the right to restrict access to or use of the museum by any user at any time.

Users are prohibited from sharing or downloading any material for publication or commercial purposes without written permission from the Executive Director. Requests for permission must be submitted by email and specify the material requested and for what purpose.

Material used with the Society's permission should be credited to: www.sechistorical.org.